Skip to content

Conversation

@maximiliankolb
Copy link
Contributor

What changes are you introducing?

Foreman 3.17 does not support foreman_acd and smart_proxy_acd.

Why are you introducing these changes? (Explanation, links to references, issues, etc.)

follow-up to #4359 (Remove docs for foreman_acd from nightly)

Anything else to add? (Considerations, potential downsides, alternative solutions you have explored, etc.)

Note that the package is currently still present on https://yum.theforeman.org/plugins/nightly/el9/x86_64/.

Contributor checklists

  • I am okay with my commits getting squashed when you merge this PR.
  • I am familiar with the contributing guidelines.

Please cherry-pick my commits into:

  • Foreman 3.16/Katello 4.18 (Satellite 6.18)
  • Foreman 3.15/Katello 4.17
  • Foreman 3.14/Katello 4.16 (Satellite 6.17; orcharhino 7.4)
  • Foreman 3.13/Katello 4.15 (EL9 only)
  • Foreman 3.12/Katello 4.14 (Satellite 6.16; orcharhino 7.2 on EL9 only; orcharhino 7.3)
  • Foreman 3.11/Katello 4.13 (orcharhino 6.11 on EL8 only; orcharhino 7.0 on EL8+EL9; orcharhino 7.1 with Leapp)
  • Foreman 3.10/Katello 4.12
  • Foreman 3.9/Katello 4.11 (Satellite 6.15; orcharhino 6.8/6.9/6.10)
  • We do not accept PRs for Foreman older than 3.9.

Foreman 3.17 does not support foreman_acd and smart_proxy_acd.

Refs theforeman#4359 (Remove docs for foreman_acd from nightly)
@maximiliankolb
Copy link
Contributor Author

draft PR until I know how this actually works.

@github-actions github-actions bot added Needs tech review Requires a review from the technical perspective Needs style review Requires a review from docs style/grammar perspective Needs testing Requires functional testing labels Oct 24, 2025
@github-actions
Copy link

@maximiliankolb
Copy link
Contributor Author

Refs ATIX-AG/foreman_acd#50

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Needs style review Requires a review from docs style/grammar perspective Needs tech review Requires a review from the technical perspective Needs testing Requires functional testing Not yet reviewed

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant